エピソード

  • Building Successful Leadership with Kindness | Ep. 21 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/12/24

    Join us in this enlightening episode of @TheScienceofLeadership with host Tom Collins, as he welcomes Catherine Krawczeski, MD to discuss the pivotal role of kindness in effective leadership.

    As the Chair of the Department of Pediatrics at The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Physician-in-Chief and Chief Medical Officer of Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Dr. Krawczeski offers unique insights into how leading with kindness not only fosters a respectful working environment but also enhances resilience and performance among teams.

    Delving into the profound relationship between kindness and leadership, Dr. Krawczeski emphasizes that respect for colleagues can transform work cultures. Highlighting personal anecdotes, she illustrates how empathy and understanding can propel individuals beyond pre-conceived limitations, fostering organizational growth and individual development. Meanwhile, Tom shares personal stories and science-backed evidence supporting the profound positive impact of kindness in leadership settings. Together, they explore practical strategies for leaders to cultivate a more compassionate approach, touching upon the significance of humility, open communication, and continuous feedback.

    Keywords in this episode include leadership, kindness, empathy, respect, team dynamics, workplace culture, coaching, personal growth, emotional intelligence, forgiveness.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Kindness in leadership is deeply intertwined with respect and empathy, playing a crucial role in effective team management and individual development.
    • Even in high-stress environments, leaders can maintain high standards while being compassionate and offering support to those who struggle.
    • Acts of grace and forgiveness from leaders can have transformative effects on team morale and productivity.
    • Effective leadership involves listening, understanding others’ perspectives, and providing constructive feedback.
    • Fostering positive social connections in the workplace can significantly impact organizational efficiency and employee well-being.

    References:

    Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing Excellence in Action: The Other-praising

    Emotions of Elevation, Gratitude and Admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105-127.

    Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., Worline, M. C., Lilius, J. M., & Kanov, J. M. Kanov. (2002) Leading in Times of Trauma. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 54–61.

    Frost, P. (1999). Why Compassion Counts! Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2), 127–133.

    Frost, P. J., Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., & Wilson, A. (2000). Narratives of Compassion in Organizations, in S. Fineman (ed.), Emotion in Organizations. Sage. p. 25–45.

    Kindness in Leadership. (2018). Haskins, G., Thomas, M., & Johri, L. (Eds.). Routledge.

    Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C. Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in Organizational Life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6),808–827.

    Solomon, R. C. (1998). The Moral Psychology of Business: Care and Compassion in the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 515–533.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    39 分
  • How Leadership Impacts Occupational Burnout | Ep. 20 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/12/17

    Join us in this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership as we explore the intricate connections between leadership, occupational burnout, and professional fulfillment, guided by the insights of world-renowned expert Dr. Tait Shanafelt. Dive deep into the science behind burnout, understand its roots, and discern how leadership styles can either mitigate or exacerbate its effects.

    In this engaging discussion, we challenge the conventional wisdom that burnout is merely pop psychology, presenting it instead as a legitimate, work-related syndrome recognized by the World Health Organization. Dr. Shanafelt articulates how leadership behaviors are crucial in influencing burnout levels, backed by substantial research linking specific leader actions to team well-being. Moreover, the episode expands on the potential systemic shifts necessary for healthcare to retain its altruistic essence, diving into the impact of leadership on healthcare quality and employee satisfaction.

    Dr. Shanafelt is an internationally recognized physician, scientist, and expert in the field of physician well-being and burnout. He is the Chief Wellness Officer at Stanford Medicine and Associate Dean at the Stanford School of Medicine. He leads Stanford’s WellMD & WellPhD Center where he and his team work to reduce burnout and improve the professional fulfillment of healthcare professionals. He has published hundreds of scientific papers, many of which focus on today’s topic, including a 2021 paper where he and his coauthors introduced the Wellness-Centered Leadership construct. Stay tuned for more enlightening discussions in upcoming episodes of the Science of Leadership, where we continue exploring the multifaceted dimensions of effective leadership in diverse industries.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Leadership behaviors deeply influence burnout and professional fulfillment; treating people with dignity, seeking input, and recognizing achievements are essential.

    • Burnout is not a personal failing but a work environment issue, affecting particularly those in high-interaction roles like healthcare professionals.

    • Effective leadership is foundational to sustaining employee well-being amidst growing healthcare challenges.

    • There is compelling evidence that leaders’ own well-being significantly impacts their leadership effectiveness and their team’s perception.

    • Altruism in healthcare is at risk if the current work structures continue to undermine professionals' innate calling to serve.

    References:

    Han, S., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Awad, K. M., Dyrbye, L. N., Fiscus, L. C., Trockel, M. & Goh, J. (2019). Estimating the Attributable Cost of Physician Burnout in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 784–788.

    Marchalik, D. & Shanafelt, T. (2020). Addressing Burnout Among Health Care Professionals by Focusing on Process Rather Than Metrics. JAMA Health Forum, 1(9), e201161. Shanafelt, T. D., Dyrbye, L. N. & West, C. P. (2017). Addressing Physician Burnout: The Way Forward. JAMA, 317(9), 901.

    Shanafelt, T. D., Gorringe, G., Menaker, R., Storz, K. A., Reeves, D., Buskirk, S. J., Sloan, J. A. & Swensen, S. J. (2015). Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 90(4), 432–440.

    Shanafelt, T. D., Makowski, M. S., Wang, H., Bohman, B., Leonard, M., Harrington, R. A., Minor, L. & Trockel, M. (2020). Association of Burnout, Professional Fulfillment, and Self-care Practices of Physician Leaders With Their Independently Rated Leadership Effectiveness. JAMA Network Open, 3(6), e207961.

    Shanafelt, T. D. & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017). Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(1), 129–146.

    Shanafelt, T. D., Wang, H., Leonard, M., Hawn, M., McKenna, Q., Majzun, R., Minor, L. & Trockel, M. (2021). Assessment of the Association of Leadership Behaviors of Supervising Physicians With Personal-Organizational Values Alignment Among Staff Physicians. JAMA Network Open, 4(2), e2035622.

    Shanafelt, T. D., West, C. P., Sinsky, C., Trockel, M., Tutty, M., Wang, H., Carlasare, L. E. & Dyrbye, L. N. (2022). Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Integration in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2020. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 97(3), 491–506.

    Shanafelt, T., Goh, J. & Sinsky, C. (2017). The Business Case for Investing in Physician Well-being. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(12), 1826.

    Shanafelt, T., Trockel, M., Rodriguez, A. & Logan, D. (2021). Wellness-Centered Leadership: Equipping Health Care Leaders to Cultivate Physician Well-Being and Professional Fulfillment. Academic Medicine, 96(5), 641–651.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 3 分
  • The Impact a Mentor Can Have | Ep. 19 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/12/10

    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins and Justin Hamrick explore the critical role of mentorship in developing effective leaders. They discuss the historical context of mentorship, the qualities that make a great mentor, and share personal experiences that highlight the profound impact mentors can have on one's leadership journey. The conversation emphasizes the importance of being proactive in seeking mentorship, setting clear goals, and maximizing the mentoring relationship for personal and professional growth.

    Keywords

    leadership, mentorship, personal development, qualities of mentors, leadership growth, mentoring relationships, professional development, leadership skills, character, competence

    Takeaways

    • Mentorship is essential for leadership development.

    • Great mentors prioritize the success of their mentees.

    • The historical context of mentorship dates back to Homer's Odyssey.

    • Qualities of effective mentors include patience, knowledge, and trustworthiness.

    • Personal experiences with mentors can shape one's leadership style.

    • Mentorship leads to increased competence and decision-making skills.

    • Finding a mentor requires proactive searching and investment.

    • Mentees should set clear goals and prepare for meetings.

    • Mentorship is an investment in personal development.

    • Continuous growth is vital for effective leadership.

    References

    Allen, T. D., & Poteet, M. L. (1999). Developing effective mentoring relationships: Strategies from the mentor’s viewpoint. Career Development Quarterly, 48(1), 59–73.

    Day, D. V. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.

    Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 254–267.

    Homer. (1996). The Odyssey (R. Fagles, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published ca. 8th century BC)

    Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分
  • Self-Discipline: A Crucial Part of Leadership Success | Ep. 18 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/12/03
    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins hosts an enlightening discussion with retired General Stan McChrystal around the pivotal role of self-discipline in leadership. In the world of leadership, self-discipline emerges as an unwavering pillar upon which extraordinary leaders build their reputations. Leaders like General Stan McChrystal provide a profound understanding of how self-discipline shapes leadership success. The dialogue presents an exploration into how self-discipline, paired with genuine humility and consistent behavior, can define the effectiveness of a leader across various contexts, including military and corporate settings. General McChrystal is a highly respected retired Four-Star General who served as the Commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan and led operations that included the capture of Saddam Hussein. A West Point graduate and Army Ranger, General McChrystal is renowned for his leadership in several key military initiatives. Post-retirement, he transitioned to academia, teaching leadership at Yale University, and has served on multiple corporate boards. He is a New York Times bestselling author with a forthcoming book on self-discipline in leadership. Listeners will gain insights into building self-discipline through practical steps and learn about the profound impacts, both positive and negative, that self-discipline has on effective leadership. Key Takeaways: The difference between discipline and self-discipline is crucial in leadership, where actions speak louder than words.Leaders must embrace self-discipline to maintain credibility and influence effectively.The cost of lacking self-discipline for leaders is significantly higher due to greater visibility and impact.Practical steps to enhance self-discipline include setting clear goals, developing habits, and practicing mindfulness.Leadership is about embodying the traits one wishes to inspire in others, even in challenging situations More information about General Stan McChrystal can be found at: https://www.mcchrystalgroup.com/ Key References: Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115-128.Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1-26.Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1773-1801.De Cremer, D., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2017). Managing trust in organizations: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 1–9. 10 Practices for improving self-disciplineLocke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009.Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933-938.Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125-143.Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247-259.Vohs, K. D., et al. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 883-898.Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Free Press.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111-135.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    50 分
  • Are Leaders Born or Made? What Science Tells Us | Ep 17 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/11/27
    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins engages with Dr. Rich Arvey to explore the age-old debate of whether leaders are born or made. Dr. Arvey shares insights from his pioneering research in behavioral genetics, focusing on how individual experiences and genetic predispositions contribute to leadership ability. The discussion delves into the results of twin studies, weaving a fascinating narrative about the sum of genetic and experiential factors in leadership development. Dr. Arvey is a highly respected figure in the field of organizational psychology and leadership genetics, has spent decades meticulously researching the interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental influences in the development of leadership qualities. During the podcast, Dr. Arvey emphasized that leadership potential results from both genetic and environmental factors. "Bottom line is that of course it's both, both genetic and environmental influences," he explained. According to study findings, about 30% of leadership potential could be attributed to genetics according to Dr. Arvey's research: "We found there is a 30% of the variation in job satisfaction among people as a genetic component." This statement signifies that while nature plays a substantial role, the bulk of leadership attributes remains shaped by nurture, accounting for 70% of the developmental spectrum. Takeaways: • Leadership is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with around 30% of leadership variation attributable to genetics. • Intelligence and unique individual experiences play crucial roles in a person's capacity to move into leadership roles. • Environmental details, such as education and work experiences, significantly shape leadership capabilities. • Research suggests that genetics might impact leadership indirectly, mediated by factors like personality and intelligence rather than directly determining leadership potential. • There is no single "leadership gene," and genetic studies generally provide correlations rather than causal evidence. References Arvey, R. D., Rotundo, M., Johnson, W., Zhang, Z. & McGue, M. (2006). The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.009 Arvey, R. D., Zhang, Z., Avolio, B. J. & Krueger, R. F. (2007). Developmental and Genetic Determinants of Leadership Role Occupancy Among Women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.693 Boerma, M., Coyle, E. A., Dietrich, M. A., Dintzner, M. R., Drayton, S. J., Early, J. L., Edginton, A. N., Horlen, C. K., Kirkwood, C. K., Lin, A. Y. F., Rager, M. L., Shah-Manek, B., Welch, A. C. & Williams, N. T. (2017). Are outstanding leaders born or made? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe81358 Chaturvedi, S., Arvey, R. D., Zhang, Z. & Christoforou, P. T. (2011). Genetic Underpinnings of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811404891 Chaturvedi, S., Zyphur, M. J., Arvey, R. D., Avolio, B. J. & Larsson, G. (2012). The heritability of emergent leadership: Age and gender as moderating factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.004 Johnson, A. M., Vernon, P. A., Harris, J. A. & Jang, K. L. (2004). A Behavior Genetic Investigation of the Relationship Between Leadership and Personality. Twin Research, 7(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.7.1.27 Johnson, A. M., Vernon, P. A., McCarthy, J. M., Molson, M., Harris, J. A. & Jang, K. L. (1998). Nature vs nurture: Are leaders born or made? A behavior genetic investigation of leadership style. Twin Research, 1(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.1.4.216 Li, W.-D., Arvey, R. D., Zhang, Z. & Song, Z. (2012). Do leadership role occupancy and transformational leadership share the same genetic and environmental influences? The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.007 Li, W.-D., Wang, N., Arvey, R. D., Soong, R., Saw, S. M. & Song, Z. (2015). A mixed blessing? Dual mediating mechanisms in the relationship between dopamine transporter gene DAT1 and leadership role occupancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.005 Neve, J.-E. D., Mikhaylov, S., Dawes, C. T., Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Born to lead? A twin design and genetic association study of leadership role occupancy. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.001 Niccol, A. (1997). Gattaca. Columbia Pictures.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    52 分
  • How to Create Successful Change with Dr. Richard Boyatzis | Ep 16 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/11/20

    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins interviews renowned leadership and change expert Dr. Richard Boyatzis. Dr. Boyatzis shares his extensive research on leadership and change, emphasizing the importance of emotional intelligence and resonant leadership. He discusses his journey from engineering to psychology, the significance of relationships in leadership, and the practical steps leaders can take to foster change and resilience in their teams. Through case studies and personal anecdotes, Dr. Boyatzis illustrates how effective, resonant leadership is rooted in shared vision, compassion, and the ability to inspire others.

    Dr. Boyatzis earned his bachelors in aeronautics and astronautics at MIT, then his masters and PhD in Social Psychology from Harvard. He is currently a Distinguished University Professor at Case Western Reserve. He is an international authority on emotional intelligence, leadership, and change. His groundbreaking work has shaped how we think about guiding others through change. He has won numerous awards for his work. He has published multiple New York Times bestselling books on leadership and is soon to publish his new book, The Science of Change.

    Key concepts in this episode include leadership, change, emotional intelligence, resonant leadership, intentional change theory, organizational change, leadership development, Dr. Richard Boyatzis, science of change, and leadership strategies.

    Takeaways

    • Leadership is fundamentally about relationships, not just authority.

    • Emotional intelligence plays a crucial role in effective leadership.

    • Resonant leadership fosters a positive emotional climate in organizations.

    • Vision and purpose are essential for motivating teams.

    • Dissonant leadership can lead to disengagement and lack of innovation.

    • Positive emotional contagion can inspire teams to achieve more.

    • Effective leaders focus on development alongside performance.

    • Engagement numbers are higher in organizations that prioritize development.

    • Leaders must reflect on their own motivations to inspire others.

    References

    • Boyatzis, R. (2024). The Science of Change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    • Boyatzis, R. E. (2006). Intentional change theory from a complexity perspective. Journal of Management Development 25(7), 607-623.

    • Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    • Boyatzis, R., Smith, M., & Van Oosten, E. (2019). Helping People Change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    56 分
  • Do Men and Women Lead Differently? What Science Says | Ep. 15 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/11/12
    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins engages in a thought-provoking conversation with leadership scientist and expert Dr. Stefanie Johnson about gender-related variations in leadership. They explore the nuances of how men and women lead, the perceptions surrounding these differences, and the impact of societal expectations on leadership effectiveness. The discussion delves into the Pygmalion effect, the importance of inclusion, and practical strategies for fostering diverse leadership environments. Dr. Johnson emphasizes the need for organizations to recognize the value of different perspectives and the importance of developing leadership skills across all genders. Dr. Johnson is the Director of the University of Colorado Boulder’s Center for Leadership and an Associate Professor in the Leeds School of Business. She has published numerous scientific papers on leadership and is the author of the Wall Street Journal Best Seller, Inclusify: The Power of Uniqueness and Belonging to Build Innovative Teams. Key concepts in this episode include gender in leadership, leadership styles, Pygmalion effect, inclusion, gender equity, leadership development, perceptions of leadership, selection bias, women in leadership, and leadership effectiveness. Key Takeaways - There are minimal differences in leadership styles between genders. - Perceptions of leadership often overshadow actual differences in behavior. - The Pygmalion effect illustrates how expectations influence performance. - Women face greater scrutiny and expectations in leadership roles. - Selection bias affects who gets promoted into leadership positions. - Leadership can be learned and developed over time. - Inclusion leads to better outcomes in organizations. - Diverse teams are more innovative and effective. - Expectations for female leaders can be a double-edged sword. - Building relationships is crucial for effective leadership. Sound Bites "There's really very little difference in how men and women lead." "We believe there's a big difference." "People behave as we expect them to behave." Key References: Johnson, S. K. (2020). Inclusify: The power of uniqueness and belonging to build innovative teams. New York: HarperBusiness. Gender has little to no relationship with leadership style and effectiveness Dobbins, G. H., & Platz, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: How real are they? Academy of Management Review, 11, 118-127.Kaiser, R. B., & Wallace, W. T. (2016). Gender bias and substantive differences in ratings of leadership behavior: Toward a new narrative. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68, 72-98.Powell, G. N. (1990). One more time: Do female and male managers differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4, 68-75.van Engen, M. L., van der Leeden, R., Willemsen, T. M. (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 581-598. Men and women are equally effective, but are more effective in leadership roles congruent with their gender Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145. Women are viewed as better leaders Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2012). Are women better leaders than men? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2012/03/a-study-in-leadership-women-doZenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2019). Research: Women score higher than men in most leadership skills. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/06/research-women-score-higher-than-men-in-most-leadership-skills Women lead in a more democratic or participative manner Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.van Engen, M., & Willemsen, T. M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94, 3-18. Women tend to emphasize social values that promote others’ welfare to a greater extent than men Schwarz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010-1028. Women tend to be more transformational than men Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., van Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    53 分
  • Making Your Leadership Vision a Reality with Tennessee Tech's President Phil Oldham | Ep. 14 | The Science of Leadership
    2024/11/05

    In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership Tom Collins interviews Dr. Phil Oldham, President of Tennessee Tech University, about the critical role of vision in leadership. Drs. Collins and Oldham discuss how to create a vision, the importance of buy-in, and the impact of timing and culture on successful leadership. Dr. Oldham shares insights from his experience in academia, emphasizing the need for collective vision and the importance of trust and authenticity in leadership. The conversation also highlights practical steps for leaders to effectively communicate and implement their vision.

    A distinguished leader in academia, Dr. Oldham holds a PhD in analytical chemistry from Texas A&M and has held key leadership roles, including Chair of the Chemistry Department and Dean at Mississippi State, and Provost at UT Chattanooga. Since becoming Tennessee Tech’s president in 2012, he has led remarkable academic and campus growth. He also serves on the NCAA Presidential Forum and the Tennessee Valley Corridor Board.

    Keywords in this episode include leadership, vision, buy-in, organizational culture, timing, trust, authenticity, risk management, collective vision, growth mindset.

    Key Takeaways

    • Vision is a crucial part of leadership.

    • Leaders help define a vision rather than create it.

    • Timing is essential for implementing a vision.

    • Cultural change in organizations takes time.

    • Collective vision can exceed individual expectations.

    • Failure is a learning opportunity, not a setback.

    • Trust and authenticity are vital in leadership.

    • Consistent leadership is necessary for success.

    • A clear vision boosts organizational commitment.

    • Practical steps are needed to create and communicate a vision.

    Sound Bites

    • "Vision without action is a pipe dream."

    • "Action without vision is a nightmare."

    • "You know it's working when it comes back to you."

    References

    Improved Alignment and Cohesion

    • Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don’t. HarperCollins, New York.

    Increased Performance and Productivity

    • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 43-54.

    Increased Creativity and Innovation

    • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.

    Increased Organizational Commitment

    • Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 949-964.

    Process for Casting a Vision and Getting Buy-in Start with Purpose & Values

    • Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65-77.

    Engage Key Stakeholders

    • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press. Boston.

    Craft an Inspiring Vision

    • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge (6th ed.). Wiley. Hoboken.

    Communicate the Vision

    • Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary Leadership: Creating a Compelling Sense of Direction for Your Organization. Jossey-Bass. Hoboken.

    Show Alignment

    • Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. Doubleday. New York.

    Empower the Team

    • Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sampler Set. Mind Garden. Redwood City.

    Lead by Example

    • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.

    Adapt as Needed

    • Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership: Tools and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World. Harvard Business Review Press. Boston

    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分