A professor is facing jail for a Facebook post that praised the army and criticised hate, in light of the Pahalgam Attack and Operation Sindoor.He was arrested for "endangering the country’s sovereignty, unity and integrity,” “promoting enmity between different groups, and “insulting the modesty of a woman.” The Supreme Court gave him interim bail—but restricted him from speaking about the topic and set up a Special Investigative Team (SIT) to "analyse his words."Why did the Court find the need to set up an SIT? What words did it find to be criminal? How important is it that we know what the Court's reasons are for taking such decisions?

How much criticism should the Court be able to withstand, before it begins to see it as speech that harms public perception on the dignity and authority of the Court?Through the comments made by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar and BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, we explore the Supreme Court's contempt jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court has been hearing cases concerning pollution in Delhi for decades now. But how much has its intervention moved the needle?Supreme Court Observer's newsletter and months of Court reporting tells a story of inaction, and weak enforcement.

In Bachan Singh (1980), the Supreme Court introduced the ‘rarest of rare cases’ standard for awarding the death penalty. But how do courts assess mitigating factors during sentencing?

In this video, we explore the uneven application of these factors, from Bachan Singh to the recent Ramesh A. Naika judgement, where the Supreme Court overturned a death sentence.

Did you know that Cornelia Sorabji from India became the first woman to pass the Civil Law examinations at Oxford? Despite passing the Bar, she was not allowed to plead before the Allahabad High Court as the profession was restricted to men at the time. Over a century later, the representation of women in the legal profession continues to be the exception and not the norm. We explore this issue in our latest video this International Woman’s Day month.

Can a conviction stand on a single testimony? The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that a prosecutrix's 'unshaken' testimony alone can secure a conviction, even without evidence of physical injury, if deemed wholly trustworthy. We summarise the key judgements where the Court has consistently upheld this principle, emphasising on credibility and confidence in the prosecutrix's statement. Watch now!

In our latest interview, Gautam Bhatia, author and advocate, sat down with Advay Vora, Assistant Editor, SCO to discuss his new book 'Indian Constitution: A Conversation with Power.' Bhatia spoke about the power dynamics between the Union and the states in a federal structure. He talked about how the Constitution as a whole has a centralising drift. He also shared some insights into his writing process and gave a little sneak peek about his upcoming work. Listen to the full interview now!

Supreme Court Observer in conversation with Justice Indira Banerjee, former Judge, Supreme Court of India. Justice Banerjee was at the Supreme Court between 2018 to 2022. In this interview she shares her views on women in the judiciary, challenges in clearing pendency and more.