Do boilerplate objections put your case at serious risk? Discover how the Delaware Chancery Court's decision in Bocock v Innovate Corp. challenges conventional practices in ediscovery. Join me, Kelly Twigger, on the Case of the Week podcast as we unravel the consequences of general objections and potential waivers under the 2015 federal rules amendment. This episode promises to equip you with cutting-edge insights into cost recovery, attorney-client privilege, and how to effectively handle the burden of discovery in litigation. Whether you are a litigator or simply intrigued by the complexities of electronically stored information, there's a wealth of knowledge waiting for you.

In this episode, we dissect the timeline and pivotal moments of the Bocock case, highlighting the plaintiffs' costly misstep of failing to deliver specific discovery responses—a misstep that led to a crucial motion to compel. Gain a deeper understanding of the court's stance on the necessity for detailed responses and what it means for your litigation strategy. With actionable insights and analysis, this episode will help you navigate the evolving landscape of e-discovery, ensuring you stay ahead of the game. Subscribe now to enrich your legal expertise and gain practical strategies for your next case.

Bocock v. Innovate Corp.,
Read the blog about this case- eDiscovery Assistant Blog
eDiscovery Assistant Website
Sign up for Kelly's Case of the Week Newsletter here
eDiscovery Assistant Free 7 day Trial (no credit card required)

Thank you for tuning in to Case of the Week with Kelly Twigger. If you found today’s discussion helpful, don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and leave a review wherever you get your podcasts. For more insights and resources on eDiscovery, visit eDiscovery Assistant and explore our practical tools, case law library, and on-demand education from the eDiscovery Academy. Join us next episode as we break down another important case shaping the future of eDiscovery.