『SPCs Unleashed』のカバーアート

SPCs Unleashed

SPCs Unleashed

著者: Stephan Neck Niko Kaintantzis Ali Hajou Mark Richards
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

For SPC’s, RTE’s and other SAFe Change Leaders, who want to extend their Lean-Agile repertoire and increase their impact, SPCs Unleashed is a weekly podcast with a group of SAFe Fellows and SPCTs working through the SAFe competencies to give guidance on when, why and how to deepen skills in that area. Season 1 was anchored in a structured exploration of the 7 core SAFe Competencies. Season 2 sees us follow our passion into topics such as coaching, facilitation, value stream mapping, and other topics we believe are crucial to change agents. We don’t focus on foundational knowledge, it’s all about sharing war stories and lessons we’ve learned the hard way. It won’t be ’one point of view’; we come from different contexts with different passions, and you’ll have more to choose from.https://shapingagility.com/shows© 2025 Shaping Agility 個人的成功 自己啓発
エピソード
  • Why the Organizing Portfolios Toolkit Isn't Just Another Workshop
    2025/06/06
    “You’re making a big withdrawal from the transformation credit bank to get that many senior executives into a room for two days, aren’t you?” – Mark Introduction What justifies pulling senior leaders away for two days of portfolio work? In this episode, Mark, Ali, and Niko dig deep into the newly released Organizing Portfolios for Strategic Agility toolkit. The discussion is honest and pragmatic—tempered by real use, not just theory—but above all, it’s focused on how the toolkit can prompt meaningful insight and concrete movement inside organizations that rarely pause to re-examine their boundaries and assumptions. Mark reflects on the toolkit’s progression from rough concept to proven tool. Ali enters as a “workshop skeptic,” bringing fresh eyes and healthy questioning from the LPM classroom. Niko connects the dots between early pilots and live delivery, sharing where even experienced hands needed to adjust. Together, the team underscores real value: the toolkit creates space for leaders to surface trade-offs and stuck patterns that often go unaddressed. This one’s for coaches, VMOs, and change agents weighing not just “will this work here?” but “how do we make real progress with our stakeholders?” Actionable Insights Here’s what the Unleashed crew surface—explicitly or between the lines—about navigating portfolio structure and workshop facilitation: - Workshops demand deep preparation, not a plug-and-play approach: Effective portfolio sessions rely on understanding the unique context, stakeholder views, and organizational politics ahead of time. “If this workshop would take us two days, I’m probably going to spend a full two weeks or more preparing for this workshop,” Ali notes. - Strategic use of the two-part design is critical: The Overview builds shared language and a safe space to test boundaries, before executives confront trade-offs in the subsequent Workshop. This separation helps surface and derisk sensitive topics before action is taken. - Language matters: frame conversations commercially: The toolkit’s focus on commercial criteria—regulatory, regional, business unit, innovation—allows executives to show up as decision-makers, not as process students. This turns frameworks into relevant strategy conversations. - Drive momentum with phased, tangible action: Close sessions with clear next steps—now, next week, next month. Appreciation and clarity matter as much as insight; don’t end on a vague list. Highlights Why This Toolkit Demands Real Facilitation Skill Mark and Niko make it clear: facilitating at this level is a distinct skill, fraught with political nuance and heightened stakes. It’s about more than managing group process—executives expect relevance and rigor. The enablement videos—especially Rebecca’s walkthroughs—surprise even seasoned coaches, who admit to slowing down and watching rather than skimming. “You have to be good in facilitating high-ranked people or people who are doing strategic things, and that’s different from a workshop you are with teams, with developers.” – Niko Who Is This Really For? Boundary Friction and Target Audience Ali presses on audience fit: “To whom is this workshop, specifically designed?” The consensus: readiness is more about mindset and context than about scale. Whether facing a complex multi-portfolio landscape or just a single portfolio, the process uncovers where leaders are stuck or blind to key trade-offs. “Some of the most profound insights and aha moments seem to come for the people who only had one portfolio, because it could help you think about what was inside your portfolio.” – Mark Action, Not Just Awareness: Generating Real Change Ali points to the challenge of translating group insight into organizational movement—especially around funding and governance. The conversation veers into the reality that a high-energy workshop can expose risk just as quickly as it exposes opportunity. “A workshop like this can become quite a snake pit...if the workshop has participants that are very eager to do something, this workshop can really make or break your push to agility.” Mark’s advice: aim for a charter you can realistically deliver on, and build your workshop flow to support that momentum. Facilitation Patterns: Building the Team and Owning the Room The team highlights running the Overview as a preparatory exercise for facilitators as much as for participants. Get your team aligned and immersed before you go live; it makes the Workshop delivery more resilient and adaptive. Niko, usually quick to customize workshops, finds the toolkit robust right out of the box—an unusual endorsement, underscoring the quality and structure of the supporting materials. The ASPC Requirement: Paywall or Professionalism? The exclusive hosting requirement for Advanced SPCs (ASPC) evokes no debate about barriers. Instead, the team emphasizes the level of craft and preparation ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分
  • What the State of SAFe Survey Actually Tells Us (and What it Doesn't)
    2025/05/26
    “Information is crucial. If you use it the wrong way, it’s the wrong data—it will influence your actions in a drastic way.” —Stephan Neck In this episode, the Unleashed crew—Mark Richards, Ali Hajou, Stephan Neck, and Nikolaos Kaintantzis—bring a practitioner’s lens to the latest State of SAFe survey. Instead of glossing over findings or defaulting to boosterism, they pull apart the data, the context, and the stories those numbers can (and can’t) tell. Ali keeps the conversation grounded, Niko brings fresh metaphors and questions, and Mark and Stephan bridge the gap between framework theory and lived experience. The result is a thoughtful exploration of how coaches and leaders can use survey insights to inform—rather than define—their next moves. Actionable Insights Here’s what the Unleashed crew surface—explicitly and between the lines—about navigating survey data, SAFe transformation, and what to do next: - Context transforms data into insight: Numbers alone aren’t enough. As the crew note, understanding who’s responding and what lens they’re using can shift a piece of data from trivia into guidance. - Patterns reveal opportunities, not just problems: Ongoing role confusion—especially between PO and PM—signals systemic friction. But it also points to clear spaces where targeted coaching, structure clarification, and realignment can unlock better outcomes. - Framework evolution is a call to creative action: SAFe, like any framework, moves forward through practical experimentation and responding to what actually works. Adaptation isn’t a burden—it's the path to staying relevant and making a real impact. Highlights The Database Dilemma: Can We Trust What We’re Reading? Instead of accepting the survey at face value, the team probe what’s beneath the surface. Stephan sets the tone: “Where’s your database? How did you gather it? ...Is it telling a good story, or is it pouring in what the challenges are?” With many responses coming from managers rather than coaches, positive statistics require a second look. “I would have expected more coaches, more SPCs… When I hear managers and being critical, is it telling a good story, or is it pouring in? What are the challenges we have?” —Stephan Neck Mark urges a tailored approach to what the survey tells us: “I want to be able to go, what if you did that same analysis and you split it by cohort—what would the difference be?” The message: questioning is healthy, and segmenting data can lead to greater clarity and more precise action. Hybrid Agility and the Trap of Surface Change Ali surfaces a recurring reality: many organizations try to “do SAFe” in parallel with established systems—resulting in overlap, frustration, and the temptation to rebrand instead of rethink. Niko highlights the missing perspective: the survey tracks practices, but less so the people-focused work of coaching and enabling adaptive change. “A lot of SAFe practices, but also the roles, are in a way done next to the existing way of working…rebranding a meeting, or rebranding a role, just giving it the new name.” —Ali Hajou The crew encourage looking beyond relabeling—real change lives in how roles are experienced and supported, not just how they’re titled. Why Are POs and PMs So Dissatisfied? One insight stands out: product owners and product managers report the lowest satisfaction. Niko notes, “POs have the most decrease in satisfaction, and the most less increase is for PMs.” Mark explains the root: “That product owner is not going to have a lot of fun, because the team’s not going to want to talk about business problems—they’re going to want to talk about mainframe COBOL.” Responsibility without genuine autonomy creates frustration. But here’s the upbeat twist: coaching and clarifying role responsibilities, especially on complex subsystem teams, offers a real lever for positive change. The data simply shines a light on where to focus next. The Language Games: Rename with Care, Build with Intention Niko points out the risk in constant renaming: “Just inventing everything new with a new vocabulary, then you have the worst of both.” Mark sums it up for coaches: “I don’t care what you call it, so long as you all call it the same thing… Let’s grow from the language you’ve got today.” The opportunity: meet teams where they are, align language deliberately, and create shared meaning rather than confusion. Data Is a Compass, Not a Map Throughout, the crew resist easy headline takeaways. As Mark puts it with a grin: “The box didn’t blow my mind, but it did confirm that I’ve been shopping at the right chocolate store.” The true gift of the survey is in confirming patterns and pointing practitioners towards areas where their energy will matter most. “It’s comforting to have the survey confirm my beliefs about the common challenges, and ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    53 分
  • From Framework to Fieldwork: Making Sense of SAFe’s New Disciplines
    2025/05/26
    “The disciplines are about problem solving. They’re a way to navigate to knowledge… Different people love to find their knowledge different ways.” — Mark Richards Introduction SPCs Unleashed returns with a stepwise, hard-nosed look at the new Scaled Agile “disciplines” announced in Sorrento—an architectural shift intended to make the framework more usable, less dogmatic, and ultimately more valuable in the context of enterprise change. With Mark Richards guiding the connection points and Stephan Neck leading the inquiry, the team (joined by Nikolaos “Niko” Kaintantzis) explores what this modular reframe really means for practitioners and transformation leaders invested in real agility, not just surface adoption. No hype here. The Unleashed crew does what they do best: challenge received wisdom, probe for real-world risks, and test whether the new direction delivers what coaches and organizations actually need. Actionable Insights Here’s what the crew surfaces—directly and by friction—about adopting the “disciplines” model for Scaled Agile: - Navigation over prescription: The move from static configurations to adaptable disciplines creates more tailored entry points for actual business problems—if you’re willing to begin with context, not the “one true path.” - Optionality introduces risk and clarity: The flexibility is real, but so is the risk of new “disciplinary silos.” Systemic glue—often in the form of LACE or a Value Management Office—matters more than ever. - Depth and teaming over overwhelm: Coaches shouldn’t be daunted by the number of disciplines now in play. The days of aspiring to be a master of everything are gone; the model favors T-shaped expertise—broad awareness, with real depth in focus areas, working in cross-functional teams where strengths combine instead of one coach trying to cover all bases. - Leadership isn’t a module: While there’s a dedicated discipline for Leadership & Culture, raising actual executive capability will almost always demand more than the framework prescribes. Highlights Goodbye “Fit All” Configurations—Hello Study, Inquiry, Focus The team unpacks what a discipline means—a field of study, not just a “box to tick.” As Stephan frames it: “You study something… you inquire—it’s not a given, then you dive into the methods, theories, and principles.” For coaches, this isn’t a theoretical shift. Navigation starts with the problem at hand. Mark calls out the storytelling value: “You can now sit and see a connected story… Discipline names guide you, then the disciplines can tell a story that is meaningful to you.” The Silo Risk: Specialization Without System Fragmentation There’s energy around the newfound freedom to “specialize”—but also caution. Niko reframes the “silo” anxiety, saying: “If there are silos, I love them—as areas of specialization. It’s better than forcing full SAFE because you think you have to do everything.” Still, the LACE becomes responsible for ensuring the overall flow: “The LACE should be the glue between the disciplines.” Not Just Clicking Around: Adaptive Learning and Agentic Guidance Mark and the crew recognize that modern knowledge-seeking isn’t about browsing static pictures: “Structuring your knowledge for a modern person means providing clarity to the information and guidance SAFE has to offer—in their particular context and situation. People are going to do what most of us do… ask our CoPilots or ChatGPT questions.” This has implications for framework design—and for the way coaches help others find, not just receive, useful knowledge. Practice as Organism, Not IT Upgrade Niko spotlights a critical mindset shift: “With disciplines, it feels more human—a living organism you actively tend, not just a system to install or upgrade.” The conversation pushes for systemic coaching and change—not checklist compliance. In Stephan’s words: “It’s a step from crawling to walking, even running.” Leadership & Culture: Essential, Yet (Still) Not Enough On the leadership discipline: Mark is frank—perhaps provocatively so: “Personally, I don’t know that teaching senior leaders to be better leaders is SAFE’s strong suit… If an enterprise wants better leaders, they’ll go elsewhere.” Niko echoes the call for “outside bodies of knowledge” and cautions that even with more content, “leadership training is not everything.” Yet, the team affirms the new model’s “red thread”: contextual, cross-cutting, lived behaviors matter. Stephan frames it clearly: “Culture isn’t a poster on the wall; it’s the sum of our behaviors… you either live it or it doesn’t exist.” Product Development Flow: Feedback Isn’t Optional When exploring the Product Development Flow discipline, Niko delivers a caution to those who see themselves as “special cases”: “Never say, ‘I don’t need this competency; ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分

SPCs Unleashedに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。