
Government Efficiency Report Reveals 94 Percent of Public Sector Workers Struggle with Bureaucratic Bottlenecks
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
This comes as the Household Energy Efficiency Statistics were published today, detailing measures under the Energy Company Obligation and Green Deal schemes across England, Scotland, and Wales[1]. While these statistics aim to track progress, many listeners are questioning whether the government's approach to efficiency is actually working.
Adding to the financial picture, the Office for National Statistics released data last week showing public sector net financial liabilities (excluding public sector banks) were estimated at 83.5% of GDP at the end of April 2025[5]. Central government spending increased to £93.9 billion in April, £4.2 billion more than the same period last year, with departmental spending on goods and services alone rising by £4.2 billion[5].
In what some are calling the "DOGE Angle" – a tongue-in-cheek reference to both the popular cryptocurrency and the Department of Government Efficiency – critics suggest that like the meme-inspired digital currency, government efficiency measures might be more hype than substance.
The Public Sector Pay Review Body's twenty-fourth report on England and Wales, published just one week ago, makes recommendations on operational manager compensation but leaves many wondering if structural inefficiencies are being adequately addressed[2].
Meanwhile, the Office for Budget Responsibility's March forecast showed nominal earnings growth easing from 4.7% in 2024 to 4.3% in 2025[4], raising questions about whether public sector workers can keep pace with rising costs while navigating bureaucratic hurdles.
As one anonymous civil servant reportedly quipped, "The efficiency reports are so inefficient, even DOGE would have a hard time making sense of them." The government has yet to respond to critiques of its efficiency programs.