EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Embroiled in Heated Exchanges and Controversial Policies
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Embroiled in Heated Exchanges and Controversial Policies
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
During Wednesday's hearing, Zeldin clashed fiercely with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) over the cancellation of hundreds of agency grants that had been awarded during the Biden administration. The confrontation escalated into a shouting match when Whitehouse challenged Zeldin's claim that every canceled grant had undergone individual review, citing contradictory sworn court filings from EPA employees. Zeldin, voice rising, insisted he had personally reviewed the grants and accused the senator of not caring about wasted taxpayer money.
This bitter exchange highlights ongoing tensions regarding the Trump administration's efforts to rescind billions in grants awarded by the EPA and other agencies during the previous administration.
In more policy-focused news, Zeldin announced major EPA actions to combat PFAS contamination on April 28. The initiative includes designating an agency lead for PFAS, creating effluent limitations guidelines to prevent these "forever chemicals" from entering drinking water systems, and working with Congress and industry to establish a clear liability framework ensuring polluters pay while protecting passive receivers.
On May 15, Zeldin proposed approving Arizona's request to oversee Safe Drinking Water Act permitting for all underground injection wells in the state. During a signing ceremony attended by several Republican congressmen from Arizona, Zeldin framed the decision as advancing "cooperative federalism" and supporting energy production while safeguarding water resources.
However, Zeldin's leadership has faced criticism from environmental advocates. On May 19, Earthjustice published an analysis challenging Zeldin's recent claims, particularly his assertion that the administration's plan to eliminate 31 public health safeguards would have "absolutely" no adverse health effects. According to the Environmental Protection Network, just 12 of these rollbacks could cause nearly 200,000 premature deaths over the next 25 years.
Zeldin has defended his approach in recent public statements, including an op-ed where he highlighted "100 environmental actions" taken by the EPA in the first 100 days of the Trump administration. He maintains that the agency is pursuing environmental stewardship while supporting economic development, rejecting what he calls "the false choice between environmental stewardship and economic prosperity."
As Zeldin continues his congressional testimony this week, these controversial policies and approach to environmental regulation remain under intense scrutiny from lawmakers and advocacy groups.