
DOGE Reshapes Federal Government: Massive Workforce Cuts and Efficiency Reforms Spark Controversy in Washington
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
In recent months, DOGE’s activities have drawn sharp public and legal attention. Just yesterday, a federal judge ordered DOGE to release records in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, intensifying scrutiny around its practices and transparency. The administration’s stance has emphasized lawfulness and efficiency, yet critics have warned of potential constitutional overreach and lack of oversight, particularly noting that Musk has not divested from companies with government contracts that may intersect with DOGE’s cost-cutting purview[2][4].
DOGE’s influence is unmistakable. The federal workforce has been cut to numbers last seen in the 1960s, with over 112,000 employees opting for voluntary “deferred resignations” and another 121,000 dismissed outright as part of efficiency drives. While supporters praise this for rooting out inefficiency, government spending overall has paradoxically continued to rise, with targeted reductions most sharply felt in sectors like foreign aid and education[5].
The current status of DOGE remains ambiguous. The organization’s temporary charter is set to end in July 2026, but internal debates and external lawsuits could determine whether its legacy outlasts even that deadline. Whether listeners see DOGE as a much-needed reform or a risk to democratic norms, it is clear that the so-called “Washington DOGE Test”—the administration’s experiment in radical efficiency—will shape debates about governance and public accountability for years to come[2][5].