Critical Thinking Tools Podcast | Episode 4: The Ten Red Flags of Pseudoscience
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Critical Thinking Tools Podcast | Episode 4: The Ten Red Flags of Pseudoscience
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
In this episode we learn about 10 signs of a pseudoscience. These correspond to those presented by Scott Lilienfeld, Steven Lynn, and Jeffrey Lohr in their book Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. These 10 red flags can be used in any science, and can be adapted to think about distinguishing knowledge and ideology in the humanities and social sciences too.
The ten red flags of a pseudoscience are:
1. Lack of falsifiability
2. Absence of self correction
3. Evasion of peer review
4. Emphasis of confirmation
5. Reversed burden of proof.
6. Lack of connectivity to existing science
7. Overreliance on anecdotes
8. Use of obscurantist language
9. Absence of boundary conditions
10. Mantra of holism.
Reference:
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (2003). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology: Initial thoughts, reflections, and considerations. In Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (pp.48-56). Guilford Publications.
For a link to a similar article in pdf form, see: https://scottlilienfeld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/lilienfeld2015-5.pdf