Controversial CIA Director Ratcliffe Shakes Up Agency with Lab Leak Theory, Personnel Overhaul, and Encrypted Chat Backlash
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Controversial CIA Director Ratcliffe Shakes Up Agency with Lab Leak Theory, Personnel Overhaul, and Encrypted Chat Backlash
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Almost immediately after assuming office, Ratcliffe’s CIA made headlines by revising the Agency’s assessment on the origins of COVID-19, acknowledging a “low confidence” judgment supporting a lab leak theory in Wuhan. This pivot in intelligence estimates signaled a willingness to revisit contentious global issues under his tenure.
Ratcliffe also presided over significant changes at the Agency itself. In early February, the CIA announced buyouts for voluntary resignations among its workforce, aiming to restructure agency personnel amid changing strategic priorities. The most controversial decision, however, came in compliance with a White House executive order: the CIA delivered an unclassified list of first names and last initials of all employees hired within the previous two years. Former intelligence officials warned that this move risked compromising agent identities and potentially weakened America’s counterintelligence capabilities by making it difficult to deploy newly hired officers.
In late March, Ratcliffe faced intense scrutiny on Capitol Hill related to his participation in a private Signal group chat that included national security officials and reportedly involved discussions about sensitive military plans concerning Yemen. The chat came to public attention when a journalist was inadvertently added to the conversation, revealing that top defense and intelligence officials—including Ratcliffe—had used the encrypted app to discuss details of a pending military strike. Congressional critics lambasted the use of a commercial messaging platform for such high-level deliberations, arguing it presented unnecessary security risks. Ratcliffe, during two days of testimony, defended the participants’ actions, stating that the information shared did not compromise classified operations and that all group members were well-versed in intelligence protocols.
Ratcliffe’s reputation as a staunch Trump ally and his experience overseeing intelligence operations during the COVID-19 pandemic and major election interference concerns continue to shape perceptions of his leadership. His tenure as DNI was marked by controversy, including the declassification of sensitive Russian intelligence reports—a move some viewed as politically motivated. Nevertheless, Ratcliffe brings a background in anti-terrorism law and legislative oversight, which informs his approach to the Agency’s evolving mission.
As Director of the CIA, Ratcliffe has already implemented high-profile and highly debated policy decisions, positioning the Agency and its leadership at the center of current debates over transparency, politicization, and workforce security across the American intelligence community.