• 26. La grammatica universale nella storia

  • 2025/04/16
  • 再生時間： 25 分
  • ポッドキャスト

26. La grammatica universale nella storia

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • In questa puntata esploriamo il concetto di grammatica universale, partendo dalla celebre formulazione di Noam Chomsky negli anni ’50, per poi intraprendere una panoramica storica che ne rivela radici ben più antiche.
    L’idea centrale è che esista una struttura innata e universale nella mente umana che rende possibile l’acquisizione del linguaggio, nonostante le evidenti differenze tra le lingue del mondo. Un concetto spesso attribuito esclusivamente a Chomsky, ma che in realtà affiora in diverse epoche e culture. Scopriremo insieme come molte intuizioni moderne fossero già presenti, in forme embrionali, nel pensiero di filosofi, grammatici e teologi del passato, e quanto la ricerca di una grammatica universale abbia attraversato e influenzato l’intera storia del pensiero occidentale.

    Grafiche: Gianluca La Bruna

    La sigla è stata prodotta da White Hot e fornita da https://freebeats.io

    Fonti:
    • Aarsleff, H. (1969). The state of nature and the nature of man in Locke. In: J.W. Yolton (Ed.) John Locke: Problems and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 99-136.
    • Baskin, W., Meisel, P. & Saussy, H. (2011). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Cardona, G. (1997) [1976]. Pāṇini: A Survey of Research. Motilal Banarsidass.
    • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
    • Chomsky, N. (1962). Explanatory models in linguistics. In: E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski (Eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 528-550.
    • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
    • Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper and Row.
    • Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chomsky, N. & Berwick, R.C. (2016). Why Only Us?. MIT Press.
    • Cohen, M. (1977). Sensible words: Linguistic practice in England 1640-1785. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
    • Covington, M.A. (1984). Syntactic theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic models of sentence structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Eco, U. (1993). La ricerca della lingua perfetta nella cultura europea. Rome-Bari: Laterza.
    • Gillon, B. S. (2007). Pāṇini’s “Aṣṭādhyāyī” and Linguistic Theory. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35(5/6), 445–468.
    • Greenberg, J.H., Osgood, C.E., & Jenkins, J.J. (1966). Memorandum concerning language universals. In: J.H. Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of language, 2nd edn. (pp. 15-27). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    • Hall, R. (1969). Some recent studies on Port-Royal and Vaugelas. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 12:207-233.
    • Hjelmslev, L. (1928). Principes de grammaire générale. Historisk-Filologiske Meddelelser. 16(1).
    • Jespersen, O. (1958) [1924]. The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    • Kak, S.C. (1987). The Paninian approach to natural language processing. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1(1):117-130.
    • Koerner, E.F.K. (1995). History of typology and language classification. In: E.F.K. Koerner & R.E. Asher (Eds.) Concise history of the language sciences: From the Sumerians to the cognitivists (pp. 212-217). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    • McGilvray, J. (2016). On the History of Universal Grammar. In: I. Roberts (Ed.) Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Murphy, J.J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from St. Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Nolan, E. & Hirsch, S.A. (1902). The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pariente, J.C. (1992). La position de la grammaire rationelle. In: M. Dascal, D. Gerhardus, K. Lorenz & G. Meggle (Eds.). Philosophy of language: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 620-637). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    • Thomas, M. (1995) Medieval and Modern Views of Universal Grammar and the Nature of Second Language Learning. Modern Language Journal 79:345-355.
    • Saussure, F.d. (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. In: T.d. Mauro (Ed.) Paris: Payot.
    • Thomas, M. (2004). Universal grammar in second language acquisition: A history. London: Routledge.
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

In questa puntata esploriamo il concetto di grammatica universale, partendo dalla celebre formulazione di Noam Chomsky negli anni ’50, per poi intraprendere una panoramica storica che ne rivela radici ben più antiche.
L’idea centrale è che esista una struttura innata e universale nella mente umana che rende possibile l’acquisizione del linguaggio, nonostante le evidenti differenze tra le lingue del mondo. Un concetto spesso attribuito esclusivamente a Chomsky, ma che in realtà affiora in diverse epoche e culture. Scopriremo insieme come molte intuizioni moderne fossero già presenti, in forme embrionali, nel pensiero di filosofi, grammatici e teologi del passato, e quanto la ricerca di una grammatica universale abbia attraversato e influenzato l’intera storia del pensiero occidentale.

Grafiche: Gianluca La Bruna

La sigla è stata prodotta da White Hot e fornita da https://freebeats.io

Fonti:
  • Aarsleff, H. (1969). The state of nature and the nature of man in Locke. In: J.W. Yolton (Ed.) John Locke: Problems and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 99-136.
  • Baskin, W., Meisel, P. & Saussy, H. (2011). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Cardona, G. (1997) [1976]. Pāṇini: A Survey of Research. Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1962). Explanatory models in linguistics. In: E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski (Eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 528-550.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. & Berwick, R.C. (2016). Why Only Us?. MIT Press.
  • Cohen, M. (1977). Sensible words: Linguistic practice in England 1640-1785. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Covington, M.A. (1984). Syntactic theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic models of sentence structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eco, U. (1993). La ricerca della lingua perfetta nella cultura europea. Rome-Bari: Laterza.
  • Gillon, B. S. (2007). Pāṇini’s “Aṣṭādhyāyī” and Linguistic Theory. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35(5/6), 445–468.
  • Greenberg, J.H., Osgood, C.E., & Jenkins, J.J. (1966). Memorandum concerning language universals. In: J.H. Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of language, 2nd edn. (pp. 15-27). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Hall, R. (1969). Some recent studies on Port-Royal and Vaugelas. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 12:207-233.
  • Hjelmslev, L. (1928). Principes de grammaire générale. Historisk-Filologiske Meddelelser. 16(1).
  • Jespersen, O. (1958) [1924]. The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Kak, S.C. (1987). The Paninian approach to natural language processing. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1(1):117-130.
  • Koerner, E.F.K. (1995). History of typology and language classification. In: E.F.K. Koerner & R.E. Asher (Eds.) Concise history of the language sciences: From the Sumerians to the cognitivists (pp. 212-217). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • McGilvray, J. (2016). On the History of Universal Grammar. In: I. Roberts (Ed.) Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Murphy, J.J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from St. Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Nolan, E. & Hirsch, S.A. (1902). The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pariente, J.C. (1992). La position de la grammaire rationelle. In: M. Dascal, D. Gerhardus, K. Lorenz & G. Meggle (Eds.). Philosophy of language: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 620-637). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Thomas, M. (1995) Medieval and Modern Views of Universal Grammar and the Nature of Second Language Learning. Modern Language Journal 79:345-355.
  • Saussure, F.d. (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. In: T.d. Mauro (Ed.) Paris: Payot.
  • Thomas, M. (2004). Universal grammar in second language acquisition: A history. London: Routledge.
続きを読む 一部表示

26. La grammatica universale nella storiaに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。