EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Spearheads Controversial Environmental Agenda Under Trump's Second Term
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin Spearheads Controversial Environmental Agenda Under Trump's Second Term
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Earlier in May, Zeldin made headlines with an op-ed in The Hill, where he defended the administration’s approach by rejecting what he called a false choice between environmental protection and economic growth. He highlighted a list of 100 actions taken in the first 100 days of President Trump’s new term, describing the EPA’s “common sense” policy as advancing American energy, reducing consumer costs, revitalizing auto manufacturing, and fostering artificial intelligence leadership, all while keeping the country’s air, land, and water clean.
A major policy development under Zeldin is the EPA’s recent action plan on PFAS, a group of “forever chemicals” contaminating water systems across the nation. On April 28, he unveiled measures including the appointment of an agency lead for PFAS, new effluent guidelines to reduce industrial discharges, and calls for a polluter-pays framework to ensure local utilities and consumers are not unfairly burdened by cleanup costs. Zeldin has actively engaged with Congress and local leaders on the financial and health impacts of PFAS contamination, promising more action to come.
However, Zeldin’s leadership has been controversial. In March, environmental organizations sharply criticized his proposal to roll back longstanding pollution limits, warning of increases in toxic chemicals, higher cancer rates, and greater risks to children’s health. The plan targets a number of key regulations, including the Good Neighbor Rule, Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, and climate pollution findings, sparking legal and political opposition from public health advocates.
Administratively, Zeldin has overseen a period of transition, marked by temporary freezes on lawsuits, rulemaking, and public communications as the agency reviews existing policies. Staffing changes are underway, with over 1,000 recent hires expected to be cut, particularly those working on climate and regulatory programs, and a return to full-time office attendance for most EPA employees following new executive orders limiting telework.
Recent budget hearings in Congress have put Zeldin’s policies under further scrutiny, as lawmakers examine funding and oversight priorities for the agency. As he navigates between economic and environmental imperatives, Zeldin’s tenure is shaping up to be one of the most consequential—and contentious—in the EPA’s modern history.